If you have any comments regarding the change then feel free to post a comment.

As for what’s next, I will be writing a few more articles review the individual aspects of the HTC Magic along with a basic “Developing with Andriod” guide which will allow you to start building your own applications. I also have a few other PHP related guides and tutorials planned which will appear as soon as possible.

in the meantime feel free to check out the previous articles and make any comments you feel are relevant

Features

Ok now down to the feature list, the basic features of this phone that come with this phone are simply what you would expect from a smart phone. By default it comes with the following:

• Wi-Fi / Bluetooth / mini USB / GPS
• Touch screen
• Email clients (x2)
• 3.2 megapixel camera with video capture support
• Integrated web browser
• Multiple Desktops (3)
• Media centre
• Calendar / multiple alarms
• Google Application Integration including Maps, Email, Talk, Search
• YouTube video player
• Desktop widgets - default widgets include calendar, music, search, analogue clock and a picture frame

These are the main default features which don’t look that impressive but the way the features are integrated throughout the phone actually works really well. There is also the ability to install further applications by utilising Google’s Android Market which contains literally hundreds of free apps that can be downloaded straight to your phone.
Now, some of you may be wondering why there are two email clients. Well, one syncs your Gmail account whilst the other allows for access to any IMAP or POP email. The latter is very easy to set up; by adding your email address and password the software looks up the email settings on the server and then allows you to tweak them if necessary. Whilst the email subsystem may not be as sweet as the Blackberry’s (which uses a push mechanism to provide a real-time email system) there are settings to define how often the client checks for new emails. There are also reports that the Google Android OS supports push technology for emails however I have yet to find any evidence of this (will research it more and report back).

Touch Screen

Now some of you may be wondering how well the touch screen interface performs. Well first impressions are very impressive with the ability to detect varying levels of pressure. The one problem I have found though is around the edges of the screen the responsiveness can be a little flaky with the occasional touch being ignored. Normally I would say this is a concern but over the past week I have found I only use the sides of the screen when using the keyboard. Saying that, the predictive text software is very good at picking up these missing key presses and as a result the inaccuracy around the very edge of the screen shortly becomes un-noticeable.
I have a few friends who are also phone mad with a couple of them owning Apple’s iPhone. Now after letting them play with the touch screen interface on the HTC Magic they were all impressed at how well the interface feels and responds in comparison to what they are used to. I would this is classed as a success for HTC’s latest addition. One friend had recently upgraded his phone to the Blackberry Storm, however after only a week he had a play with this and immediately rang Vodafone to switch to the Magic.

Could this be the nearest competitor to Apple’s iPhone? Could Apple’s domination in the Smartphone industry be over? Where do you see the future of Smartphone’s heading?

• 2006 saw 763 sites stripped off
• 2007 saw 1689 sites stripped off
• 2008 saw 2189 sites stripped off

Want to join in? Head over to the Annual CSS Naked Day website and show your support

Just out of interest too, removing stylesheets allows you to see how accesibly your website is too

This got me thinking about the current state of standards on the internet. I even posted a question a on Linkedin which revealed some interesting answers. It seems that most professionals do actually abide by some form of standard beit accessibility related or validation related. The conclusion I have drawn from the answers on Linkedin and my own personal experience is that if you conform to one of the main standards out there (WGAC or one of the many HTML validators out there) then chances are you will meet the majority of criteria from one of the others and with a small amount of tweaking you can create a site which is both valid and accessible to around 95% of users who frequent the internet.

I was also reminded of the Disability and Discrimation Act (DDA) which in the UK states that websites need to be accessible by all who wish to view them. The problem with this law is that it is vague with regards how far you need to go in order to comply with it. The other problem with this law is that there is nobody policing it, if there was then maybe the standard on the internet would be a little higher.

A couple of questions to think about are:

1. Are your current systems accessibly?
2. If so, how far did you go (i.e. WCAG 1.0 AAA)?
3. If not, why not?

• Type of website & Target audience
• Consistency (i.e. look and feel)
• Font types & Colour schemes
• Graphics both quantity and impression
• Browser compatibility and resolution

The above list shows a few considerations which I believe to be the most important when designing a website but as I am a developer if someone wants to correct me then feel free. However allow me to justify my decision before you do

Target audience and the type of website

The theory behind this choice is that without knowing what type of website it and what sort of audience the website is aimed at then how can an appropriate design be created? For example, if your site offers children’s toys then the target audience is going to be either children or their parents. Does this mean that you design the site with a very corporate feel to it or do you create a design which is full of colour and brings the site alive? Personally I would go for the latter but that could just be down to my personal taste.

Consistency, colour and font-types

During my time as a developer I have come across many sites with many different designs and to say that some of them are shocking is an understatement. For example, I see time after time sites that have a pale gray font colour on a white background or a deep gray colour on a black background. What is the point of having text on a page if people can’t read it? Does the same theory apply to fonts? Well I believe it does, again if the font size is too small then the majority of people won’t think about increasing the font size within the browser settings in order to read the content on a site. Likewise if the font is too large then there won’t be enough content being displayed within the browser window and people will have to keep scrolling either just up and down or worse left, right, up and down. Font-types is a more interesting one and I could spend the next hour or so discussing why certain fonts should and should not be used but it basically boils down to choosing the most appropriate font-family for the content of the site. However depending on the browser, these fonts may not even be displayed so the effect that the design is trying portray may not even be seen.

I have always been a big believer in accessibility and recent studies show that text on white background is the most legible. Don’t get me wrong, there’s definitely a continuum of other colour pairs which provide a high enough level of contrast so not to sacrifice the legibility of the text. So why are there so many designs out there who believe that yellow on white works?

So that’s colour covered, now for fonts. Does the same theory apply to fonts? I believe it does, basically for the same reason why the fonts in a book are all legible and use a standard font.

With regards consistency, people like predictable things. So surely the same goes for web design? If a design has a good structure, where the menus are located in the same place on every page then people know exactly where to look in order to move through your site. Does this same principle apply to design? If you’re browsing through a site and suddenly everything changes colour or the font suddenly changes size or style would this affect your impression of the site?

Graphics

As a developer I have always tried to build sites which load very quickly so have never been a huge fan of large images or flash files embedded within the page. Maybe with the way technology is evolving this is no longer a concern, I don’t know.

Graphics are typically the first part of the site that a user sees (headers are typically images), therefore does it make sense to make this image represent what the rest of the site is going to look like or should it look completely different so that is stands out? I appreciate the fact that images are becoming a big part of designs not just as headers but also for bullet points, headings, lists, page backgrounds, the list goes on. But when does too much actually become too much?

With regards the impression they provide, I agree that a really nice header image can improve the overall look and feel of a site to no end but what about flash or JavaScript rotators? Can these be detrimental to a site? If you have content on your site that you want people to take notice of why provide them with something that will distract them every few seconds? Also with regards flash headers or sidebar elements what’s the point in having a 5MB flash file embedded into the header? Will this not just cause more people to leave than stay due to the time it takes to load the page, I believe it does. If you don’t then believe this is an issue then please free to convince me otherwise.

Browser considerations and resolutions

As a developer I am always testing websites in all the major browsers, should designs be treated in a similar fashion? For example are there certain aspects of a design which are not possible in one browser but will work in another. To be honest I think this more of a design implementation consideration than a design consideration because there are always ways around browser limitations which allow for designs to be implemented. Again if you disagree with this analysis then please let me know.
Anyway this is just the beginning of a process I keep thinking about with regards the overall website development process and there will probably similar post to this cropping up as I consider the other aspects. Hope it wasn’t too boring for anyway that made it to this point and thanks for reading.

The main reason for this is that the old site was very dated and the new site is now under development and will be here shortly (well once it’s finished).

All the old guides, tutorials etc are still available upon request and they will all be included when the new site arrives. In the meantime you want to add to the guides etc then let me know.

In the meantime, feel free to take a look around and post any comments you feel fit and check back for more updates.

One of the contributing reasons to this is the presence that UFindUs has built up on the internet, this purchase by BT now means that both companies have a very good chance of rapidly becoming the biggest and best online directory systems on the internet.

David Benjamin, chief executive of BT Directories said

Ufindus will play an important role in the continued development of BT Directories’ online portfolio.

Through Ufindus’ considerable expertise and experience in online classified advertising, we access further local classified product offerings, significant search traffic and new customers for this fast-growing part of our business

For more information visit The growth of Customer Street

Not finding enough time to get out on the course?

Then check out  shot shotonline.gamescampus.com/. Its a free online golf simulator where you can level up and play your favourite game with other like minded people from all over the world.

Theres loads of resources on the net from guides and tutorials to different guilds that you can join and compete against other guilds for a Guild House.

Dont worry if you don’t think your site does meet the majority of the web standards, its more about joining in and seeing what your site looks like naked .

So head over to naked.dustindiaz.com/ signup and show your support for Web Standards on the internet

A couple of weeks back a friend of mine asked me if I could create him an on-line store for his company, Racebits. At the moment there is very little happening with Racebits because the person who was developing it decided they only wanted to have a forum and not bother with the functionality of the online store.

The current system comprises of the open source cart system osCommerce, a bolt on forum called MyBB and thats it. The objective is to utilise one system which can combine both systems and utilise one member-base for both systems, along with a consistant look and feel.

Due to the company being a sales company I looked around for a system which would be suitable but there appears to be none which fit the criteria and are any good or maybe I didn’t look hard enough lol.

I decided to play around with Zen Cart too which is supposed to be the best there is for an Open Source E-commerce site. So I set about installing it and it all went fine so I proceeded to install the example dataset and visited the home page and my first impressions were not that good to be honest. I found the layout and content cluttered and it seemed disorganised to me. I know I can change all the layout and the content for the system but when a default install looks as gash as this I feel like its going to take a huge amount of time and work. The other thing I found with Zen Cart is that the documentation isn’t that well developed, although there is a lot of it, and it looks like its made up from a load of forum posts and guides that the community has created. My final thought about Zen Cart is that it seems somewhat antiquated from what you would expect from a modern day system.

I mentioned this to a collegue of mine at work and he suggested taking a look at a relatively new system called Magento. So I did, and from first impressions this looks like an awesome system, albeit a little under developed. It has a very clean and intuitive interface and the final system looks like its going to be full of all those little features you wish you got with the others lol.

So I decided to install it on my dev server, after looking at the requirements it appears to need the latest version of everything, which isn’t a bad thing. The install process was pretty straight forward and it included an auto update process to ensure that it was installing the latest version … nice touch. They also provide a way of using the system with php4 which uses the cgi-bin version of php5 so I tried to use this on my live server to see if it could be easily done and ran into a few problems. I am looking into a solution and if I find one then I will update this post to reflect the changes. There are also reports about the ability to merge Magento with Joolma and JFusion. Not sure whether this will work or not but I will have a play this evening and report back. If it does integrate with joomla then the possibilites are endless lol.

After looking through the files and directory structure for the system it loooks like the system is developed using a ‘Model-View-Controller’ architecture. There is a very good article on MVC architecures over at www.phpwact.org/pattern/model_view_controller